Adopting this plan means letting go of organization ego’s desires to triumph by being the one to claim the finish lines. No one is taking leadership, nor any group because leadership means inclusion and delegation from grassroot to organizational.
So why would the LGBT community piggy back this and waste time and energy. There will be opposition on a vareity of principals and those extraneous principals, many more than LGBT inequality, ought not usurp our power. Arguing for ourselves in combined format is very risky in my opinion. I personally think that with a real push, UAFA can pass and sooner than we think. With all due respect tom those much wiser and more experienced than me, there is a great deal missing in our lobbying and organizational efforts. However this does not mean we should not ask for inclusion, but I would not conduct my fight in the CIR arena – we have a much better case for Equality and civil rights than we do for Immigration reform, at least as far as America is concerned.
The biggest mistake is the willy nilly way we are all proceeding, – unity is imperative and hence there ought to be a masterplan. Guess what I have developed a National Master plan – has any organization done ghat yet? If not you are more than welcome to mine.
Focus on UAFA not CIR (Melanie Nathan)
Posted by
Fight4theRight 1058 days ago
(http://oblogdeeoblogda.wordpress.com)
Who Voted for this Story
Feedburner
Promoting public awareness of the need for fairness in immigration policy particularly as it relates to the rights of same-sex bi-national couples in the United States who seek equal immigration rights; Providing information regarding political issues relating to gay immigration equality issues, rights and policy.
Comments