For me, I still want to see UAFA passed, but this article helps me realize why I am more in line with CIR, rather than UAFA. Ben and I have more to benefit from CIR than we do UAFA, as I understand it. But why should I have to choose? I want both. If 20 other countries see gays as equal when it comes to immigration, why can't we? I feel that it is similar to how the Dream Act is separate from CIR, yet it doesn't mean that we should choose between one or the other, or wait for one before the other. I also feel that gays shouldn't be so critical of this article just because the author doesn't believe in marriage, for anyone, or that the UAFA isn't the miracle it is touted as. I believe that it should be incorporated into CIR, or as a stand-alone bill. I disagree with it in that I feel it should help all gay binational couples without penalization, regardless of the legal status of the fore
Search results for queercents
the fake mexican about An Article on Queercents by Yasmin Nair
Posted by
OurHero-Tan 1101 days ago
(http://fakemexicanblog.blogspot.com)
« previous1 next »
“How may I assist with these stories, if at all?...”
“My question back to you is how do we get immigration reform defined as a...”
“Watch the actual video on ABC 7's website, and you'll see that he's really...”
“Thanks. I shortened it through tinyurl. Works now....”
“Note from imeQ about this editorial: This is an independent project which...”
Feedburner
Promoting public awareness of the need for fairness in immigration policy particularly as it relates to the rights of same-sex bi-national couples in the United States who seek equal immigration rights; Providing information regarding political issues relating to gay immigration equality issues, rights and policy.